Pay to win? Diablo Immortal player spends $138k but gets 'locked out'

It's been said that it gets lonely at the top, but not if you have money to do something about it.

A Diablo Immortal streamer, who goes by JT, released a YouTube video on July 31 detailing a conundrum he's facing after literally paying his way to the top.

In a video titled "Should I refund 100k on Diablo Immortal", JT explained he spent US$100,000 (S$137,698) on the game to gear up his character but he's now 'locked out' from one aspect of the game.

[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Evu5Q-HljhI&ab_channel=jtisallbusiness[/embed]

Due to the strength of his character, he's virtually unmatched in Diablo Immortal's Battleground (their version of player-versus-player or PvP), resulting in the game's inability to find an opponent for him that matches his power level.

In most games with a PvP format, there's usually an in-built filter in the matchmaking process to pair people of a similar strength against each other. This is to avoid a scenario where a strong opponent just walks all over weaker players.

For JT's case, the game looks at his win-loss ratio (also known as matchmaking record) to determine who to match him against. However, since he's been steamrolling his opponents, there's no one close enough to match him.

The Twitch streamer said: "When I first started this game, I spent a ton of money right at the start so I was way far ahead of everybody else... I would go like 40-0, 50-0; it didn't matter. I would go a hundred battlegrounds without losing a single one.

"My overall battleground record is somewhere in between 300 and 450 wins with at max three total losses."

[[nid:587069]]

This situation has been going on for a month and a half and JT estimates that he has spent somewhere between 48 and 72 hours thus far trying to find a match but has been unsuccessful.

However, the inability to play PvP is also inhibiting the progression for his clan (or what you will know as a guild) as he needs to fight in a battleground in order to complete an objective. He has tried some workarounds but they've been futile.

He has also reached out to Blizzard a little over a month ago but he claimed that they've yet to rectify it.

JT recalled: "I contacted Blizzard a little over a month ago about this situation... They then told me to go to the forums and make a forum post about it because that's how they react to people. So I went and made a forum post about it, I sent my entire Twitch audience to the forum post to fire it up... there were over 200 comments on it... 

"Since that has been posted over three weeks ago, Blizzard has not responded one time to that forum post."

As there has been no solution and he's been artificially locked out of PvP, JT isn't sure what is the right course of action.

"Do I just not do anything about this or should I hire a lawyer and refund this account and then see what happens then?" he asked in the video.

Ironically, most of the viewers didn't sympathise with his situation and mocked him for spending money on the game.

The remarks ranged from saying he "got what he paid for" and that he's the reason Blizzard will continue with pay-to-win features and microtransactions.

However, there were also some who sympathised with him and felt that he should not be penalised for, well, paying to win.

It's also unsurprising why people reacted negatively to JT as the microtransactions and pay-to-win format in Diablo Immortal have been a controversial decision and rubbed fans the wrong way.

One livestreamer on Twitch spent NZ$24,995 (S$21,650) to get one maxed-out five-star gem — the highest quality you can get.

According to a Reddit post, a user calculated that players could expect to spend anywhere between US$2,450 (S$3,434) and US$25,530 to get one maxed five-star gem, given that there was no pity system implemented in the game that would guarantee rewards for players after a certain number of attempts.

Yet, Blizzard CEO Mike Ybarra has defended the inclusion of microtransactions and said players could do "99.5 per cent of everything in the game".

He explained to the Los Angeles Times last month: "The monetisation comes in at the end game. The philosophy was always to lead with great gameplay and make sure that hundreds of millions of people can go through the whole campaign without any costs."

[email protected]